Legal Opinion

Mandy Nielsen v. Seven Seventeen Credit Union, Inc. et al.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided February 27, 2026No. 4:24-cv-00579Unknown

1Opinion

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MANDY NIELSEN, ) CASE NO. 4:24-CV-00579 ) Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON v. ) ) SEVEN SEVENTEEN CREDIT ) MEMORANDUM OF UNION, INC. et al., ) OPINION AND ORDER ) [Resolving ECF Nos. 69, 70] Defendants. ) The Court considers Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. See ECF Nos. 69, 70. Because there are no genuine disputes of material fact and for the reasons herein, both Motions are granted. I. INTRODUCTION A. HISTORY Plaintiff Mandy Nielsen met Defendant Angelo…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API