Legal Opinion

People v. Kennedy

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1920No. Crim. No. 715PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Upon an information charging him therewith, defendant was convicted of rape, alleged to have been committed upon a female, a young girl of the age of fourteen years, who was not his wife. From the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.

[1] It is urged that the trial court committed prejudicial error in permitting the district attorney, after he had concluded his opening argument to the jury, to reopen the case for the purpose of introducing direct, evidence that the prosecutrix was not the wife of defendant. The reopening of a case for further evidence,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. BencCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Cousins v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. McPhersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. State v. MeisterOregon Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McIlvainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. People v. HamilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. GossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. McIlvainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API