Advocacy Organization for Patients & Providers v. Auto Club Insurance

I join fully in Justice CAVANAGH’s concurrence.

I write separately because this case is further evidence that this Court needs to address and open for public comment the specific procedures to be followed when a justice decides whether or not to participate in a case, and whether Const 1963, art 6, § 6 requires justices to give written reasons for their decisions whether or not to participate in a case.

*97When this Court entered its order granting leave to appeal on June 25, 2004, Justice YOUNG was shown as not participating; he is also shown as not participating in this memorandum opinion. No…