Tichenor v. Coggins
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Curry County. On the eighteenth day of November, 1878, the respondent commenced an action against Jason Springer & Co., on a promissory note executed and delivered by them, and made payable to the order of A. Crawford & Co., for one thousand one hundred and fifty dollars, which was duly indorsed and transferred to the respondent.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Curry County. On the eighteenth day of November, 1878, the respondent commenced an action against Jason Springer & Co., on a promissory note executed and delivered by them, and made payable to the order of A. Crawford & Co., for one thousand one hundred and fifty dollars, which was duly indorsed and transferred to the respondent. Proceedings in attachment against the property of Jason Springer & Co. were commenced the same day, and on the twenty-first day of November, a large amount of real and personal property belonging to them was attached by the sheriff of Curry county, in…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Kelly, C. J.:
The first assignment of error by the appellant is: That the court erred in denying the motion of Clifford Coggins, assignee of the defendants, Jason Springer and others, under the act of the legislature, entitled “ An act to secure creditors a just division of the estate of debtors who convey to assignees for the benefit of creditors,” approved October 18, 1878, * * * for leave to interplead, and to move the court to dissolve the attachment issued in said cause on the nineteenth day of November, 1878. Section 40, page 112, of the civil code, provides that “the court…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Brune v. McDonaldOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Josephi v. FurnishOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- McGilchrist v. FiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. ChrismanOregon Supreme Court · 1930