Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Institute of Chemical Engineers v. Reber-Friel Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 28, 1982No. 928, Docket 81-7695Published

1DissentMansfield, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority proceeds on the erroneous assumption that the restrictive covenant here must be treated the same as one of adhesion that might be extracted by a powerful employer from an employee, which will not be enforced by New York courts when it prevents the employee from earning his livelihood elsewhere. But no such circumstances are present here. The present covenant was agreed to after arm’s-length bargaining between a trade association (AIChE) and a well-established independent corporate management organization (Reber) that will continue, as it has in the past,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Reed, Roberts Associates, Inc. v. StraumanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Triebwasser & Katz, a Partnership Consisting of Jonah Triebwasser and William Katz v. American Telephone & Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API