Legal Opinion

Marberry v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1984No. 48538PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Movant William Marberry (hereafter “defendant”) appeals the summary denial of his Rule 27.26 motion.

Defendant had been jury-convicted of armed robbery and burglary and sentenced to consecutive ten and five year prison terms. Affirmed on appeal; State v. Marberry, 639 S.W.2d 290 (Mo.App.1982).

Defendant now dually challenges the summary denial of his motion. He first contends trial counsel “failed to call witnesses requested by movant”. Second, trial counsel “failed to properly interview and investigate the witnesses to be called by the state”. We rule each point in order.

I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Tollison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Shelley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Page v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. MarberryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Rentschler v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  3. Allbritton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API