Allbritton v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion, without an evidentiary hearing, to vacate his jury conviction for forcible rape, forcible sodomy, attempted forcible sodomy, burglary first degree and exhibiting a dangerous and deadly weapon. Movant’s conviction was affirmed in State v. Allbritton, 660 S.W.2d 322 (Mo.App.1983). We affirm.
The trial court sustained the State’s motion for summary judgment, denying mov-ant’s Rule 27.26 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing. In his motion, movant listed seventeen allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel and six alleged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Haliburton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- State v. AllbrittonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- McAlester v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ahart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Lane v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Childress-Bey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. KittrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.