Legal Opinion

Harmon v. McCormack

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1913No. 3210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Brror from County Court, Tulsa County; N. J. Gubser, Judge. Action by Mrs. D. McCormack against George D. Harmon. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GALBRAITIT, C.

The plaintiff in error appeals from the judgment of the county court of Tulsa county by petition in error and case-made. It appears, however, that nothing is presented for review by the record in this case, for the reason that the case-made is not authenticated as required by statute (section 5242, Rev. Laws 1910). The case-made appears to have been signed by the trial judge on October 7, 1911, but it was not attested by the clerk, and the seal of the court was not attached thereto, nor was it filed with the papers in the case.

It follows that the appeal must be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollard v. Oklahoma City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Brooks v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Stallard v. KnappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Marple v. Farmers' & Merchants' Nat. Bank of NoconaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. CurrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Kinnon v. Cote Piano Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API