Legal Opinion

Murray Co. v. E. Van Winkle Gin & Machine Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Decided June 2, 1910Published

In Equity. Suit by the Murray Company against the E. Van Winkle Gin & Machine Works.

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

This is a bill brought by the complainant against the defendant to enjoin the latter from the infringement of letters patént No. 472,607, issued by the Patent Office April 12, 1892. The patent which it is claimed the defendant company has infringed is for a “new and useful improvement, in apparatus for elevating, distributing and feeding seed cotton to gins.” The claims of the patent which are alleged to have been infringed are Nos. 1, 2, 9, and 12 of said letters patent No. 472,607. Those claims are as follows:

One:

“In apparatus for elevating, distributing and feeding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dudley E. Jones Co. v. Munger Improved Cotton Mach. Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1891
  2. Murray Co. v. Continental Gin Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API