Legal Opinion

United States v. Kirsch

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 16, 2015No. 07-CR-304S (6)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

’ Presently before this Court is Defendant Mark N. Kirsch’s second Motion for a New Trial brought under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. (Docket Nos. 788, 809, 810.) The government opposes Kirsch’s motion, (Docket No. 807.) For the reasons discussed below, Kirsch’s motion is denied.’-

*313II. BACKGROUND

On March 7, 2014, a jury convicted Kirsch of racketeering conspiracy; Hobbs Act conspiracy, and attempted Hobbs Act extortion. Thereafter, on March 31, 2015, this Court acquitted Kirsch of attempted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Elonis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Trey M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State of West Virginia v. Matthew CalvertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. Trey M.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API