Legal Opinion

Berryhill v. Trailkill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1916No. 7842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Wagoner County; George C. Crump, Assigned Judge. Action by Harvey K. Thrailkill against W. T. Berryhill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This action originated in the justice court in Wagoner county. The plaintiff below, Harvey K. Thrailkill, filed his bill of particulars in two. counts, alleging in the first that he had entered into an oral contract with the defendant, W. T. Berryhill, by the terms of which he undertook to construct for him a cistern of certain dimensions, and for which the defendant agreed to pay him the sum of $90, and alleged his performance of such contract. On the second count he sought to recover upon a quantum meruit. Defendant answered, admitting the contract, but alleging…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Carden v. HumbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Spencer v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Parker-Gordon Cigar Co. v. Wood & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API