Legal Opinion

Warnock v. Seattle Times Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1956No. 33298PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*451Weaver, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of dismissal for want of prosecution based upon Rule 3, Rules of Pleading, Practice and Procedure (34A Wn. (2d) 69), which provides that

“Any civil action shall be dismissed, without prejudice, for want of prosecution whenever the plaintiff or cross-complainant shall neglect to note the action for trial or hearing within one year after any issue of law or fact has been joined, unless the failure to briiig the same on for trial or hearing was caused by the party who makes the motion to dismiss. Such motion to dismiss shall come on for hearing only after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Washington Water Power Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Paine-Gallucci, Inc. v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Hayes v. QuiggWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. White v. MillionWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Morin v. BurrisWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dlouhy v. DlouhyWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Gage v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. City of Des Moines v. PERSONAL PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS $81,231 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API