Legal Opinion

Waterbury v. NICOL

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOOZE, A.C.J.

This is a suit for removal of trustees, an accounting, and other relief, brought by Mary Nicol Waterbury, as plaintiff, against Bella S. Nicol, George Black, and James Douglas Nicol, individually and as trustees *597under the last will and testament of James Nicol, deceased, and Helen Gorham Nicol, as defendants. During the pendency of the suit defendant George Black died testate, and George Black, Jr., and Harvey Nicol Black, as executors of the estate of said decedent, were substituted as parties defendant. A decree was entered in favor of defendants, dismissing plaintiff’s suit;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Blauvelt v. the Citizens Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Rodick v. PineoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. GuissOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Strickland v. Arnold Thomas Seed Service, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Royal Properties, Inc. v. Arizona Title Insurance & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. McNeely v. HiattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Wilkins v. LasaterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API