Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wrigley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2009No. 33A05-0903-CV-156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, Erie D. Smith (Smith), an inmate at the New Castle Correctional Facility, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Jeff Wrigley (Wrigley), the superintendent of that facility, and David Ittenbach (Itten-bach), the grievance executive assistant at the facility.

We reverse.

ISSUE

Smith presents two issues for our review, one of which we find to be dispositive and restate as: Whether the trial court erred in dismissing Smith's complaint as frivolous under Indiana's Frivolous Claim Law, Ind.Code § 34-58-1-2.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Smith v. DonahueIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. WrigleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Smith v. SGT. THOMPSON, DHBIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Delmas Sexton II v. State of Indiana: Allen County Public Defender's Office (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Michael Halliburton v. Tennessee Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
  5. Ricky Outlaw v. Indiana Dept. of Corrections, Keith Butts, Rick Talley, Bruce Lemon, and Alan FinnanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API