Kunkalman v. Gibson
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Noble Circuit Court; Joseph W. Adair, Judge. Drainage proceeding by John Kunkalman and others against which Harlan Gibson and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment dismissing the proceeding, petitioners appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGillett, C. J.
This proceeding was instituted by appellants in the court below to establish a public drain. At the January term, 1904, the proceeding was docketed and drainage commissioners appointed. January 1, 1906, the commissioners filed their report, locating the work and making assessments of benefits, and at the same term appellees filed a plea to the jurisdiction, wherein they sought to show that the work as described in the petition and report would lower certain fresh-water lakes of an area greater than ten acres *506each. After unsuccessfully demurring to the plea, appellants interposed a motion in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Taylor v. StrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Board of Commissioners v. JarneckeIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Pittsburgh v. KalchthalerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
3Cited by26 opinions
- King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Evans v. Yankeetown Dock Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Baker v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. & MONSANTO CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Meade Electric Co., Etc. v. Hagberg Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.