Legal Opinion

United States v. P. Koenig Coal Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 22, 1924No. 8875PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, District Judge.

This cause is now before the court, on demurrer to an indictment, for the second time. On the pre-» vious hearing a demurrer to the indictment then pending was sustained for reasons pointed out in the written opinion of the court, as reported in 291 Fed. 385. Thereafter another indictment was returned against the defendant based upon the same transactions as were involved in the previous indictment, but framed in an effort to avoid the objections sustained on the former hearing. A demurrer has again been filed, challenging the sufficiency of the present indictment on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1918
  2. United States v. P. Koenig Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. (PC) Jacobs v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (PC) Latu v. Mc FaddenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PC) Tamrat v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Mark Trujillo, et al. v. City of Chandler, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API