Legal Opinion
(PC) Jacobs v. CDCR
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 13, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01599Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE E. JACOBS, Case No.: 1:17-cv-01599-DAD-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS ACTION 13 v. 21-DAY DEADLINE 14 CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 George E. Jacobs alleges that the defendants failed to provide adequate medical care and 18 subjected him to excessive force. (Doc. 23). In two screening orders, the Court cautioned Plaintiff 19 that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20 prohibits him from bringing unrelated claims against 20 unrelated parties in a single action.1 (Doc. 14…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.