Legal Opinion

Hopson v. Clary

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 18, 1996No. 2479PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Sandra D. Hopson, brought this action against respondent, William L. Clary, seeking damages arising out of an automobile accident. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of Clary and Hopson appeals. We affirm.

The record reveals on November 18, 1992, Hopson picked up her son from school and drove toward her mother’s residence to deliver some groceries. Hopson was traveling down Read Street with Clary following behind her. Hopson slowed her automobile and pulled to the right. Hopson attempted to make a U-turn and Clary’s vehicle collided with hers.

The trial judge granted Clary’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Concrete Supply CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Odom v. SteigerwaldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Whelan v. WelchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Haulbrooks v. OvertonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bloom v. RavoiraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Bailey v. SegarsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Snavely v. AMISUB of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Avant v. Ahern Rentals IncDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API