Legal Opinion
Greg E. Searles v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1993No. 92-55005PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
Greg Searles, a resident of Arizona, brought an action in the Central District of California against Cincinnati Insurance Company (“Cincinnati”), which has its principal place of business in Cincinnati, Ohio. Searles alleged that Cincinnati breached its insurance contract when it failed and refused in bad faith to indemnify Searles for damages and costs of defense resulting from an action brought against Searles for libel, slander, unfair competition and malicious prosecution. Before Cincinnati filed its answer, the district court sua sponte dismissed the action without…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Joanne Beckham v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Vicente Acevedo Velez v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Northbrook National Insurance v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Myers, Kevin v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Joseph Alton Bowers v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Loretta Elliott v. American States Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- South Carolina Dept. Of Health And Environmental Control v. Commerce and Industry Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Smith v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2002
- Davis v. CareyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Corn v. Precision Contracting, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.