Legal Opinion
Kelley v. Osborn
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided May 27, 1958No. 7 Div. 482PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Upon a consideration of the application of the appellant for a rehearing, the former opinion is withdrawn and the following becomes the opinion of the court.
Kelley, at some time not specified in the record, “bought” a business in Gadsden known as “Alabama Home Supply.” The terms and conditions of this transaction do not appear.
The former owners, Mr. and Mrs. Meador, had sold a television set to Mr: C. E. Osborn on a conditional sale. They had assigned the contract at its inception to General Electric Credit Corporation. Osborn later died, and on Mrs. Osborn’s nonpayment Kelley…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commercial Credit Co. v. TarwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Helmetag's Adm'r v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Stull v. Daniel MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Marx v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Commercial Credit Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kelley v. OsbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959