Samczyk v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AMEND REMOVAL PETITION
SUHRHEINRICH, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon plaintiff’s motion to remand and award of attorney fees and defendant’s motion to amend removal petition. Plaintiff commenced this action in state court asserting claims under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq., and the Michigan Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act, M.C.L.A. § 37.1101 et seq. Defendant removed this action based upon diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff asserts, however, that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New England Concrete Pipe Corporation v. D/c Systems of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Charles Gonsalves v. Amoco Shipping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Hages v. Aliquippa & Southern RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hummel v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop EstateDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990
- Newton v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. ConsolidatedDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Dibble v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- Palser v. Burlington Northern R. Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988