Legal Opinion
Brown's Executors v. Farnandis
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 8, 1902No. 3783PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. William Hickman Moobe, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered hy
Fullerton, J.
The respondent Farnandis constructed for one Amos Brown a hrick and stone building under a contract which contained, among others, the following provision:
“No alterations shall he made in the work shown or described by the drawings and specifications, except upon a written order of the architect, and, when so made, the value of the work added or omitted shall be computed by the architect, and the amount so ascertained shall be added to or deducted from the contract price. In case of dissent from such award by either party hereto, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonald v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Emery v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
- Van Hook v. BurnsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cassara v. WoffordSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Arbitration Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. Lake Washington ShipyardsWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Martin-Morris Agency, Inc. v. MietznerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970