Lloyds v. Howard
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CALVERT, Justice.
Respondent, Joe B. Howard, sued petitioner, Associated Employers 'Lloyds, tó set aside a compromise ■ settlemént ■ agreement and a releáse, executed by him,' in order that he might seek recovery of additional benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. aft. 8306 et seq. Trial was by the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for respondent. -The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 288 S.W.2d 861.
A chronological history of events leading up to the suit will make the issues more understandable. The events related will be those…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
- Traders & General Insurance v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- TEXAS EMPLOYEES'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Associated Employers Lloyds v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956