Legal Opinion

Lloyds v. Howard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1956No. A-5828Published

1Opinion of the Court

CALVERT, Justice.

Respondent, Joe B. Howard, sued petitioner, Associated Employers 'Lloyds, tó set aside a compromise ■ settlemént ■ agreement and a releáse, executed by him,' in order that he might seek recovery of additional benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. aft. 8306 et seq. Trial was by the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment for respondent. -The judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 288 S.W.2d 861.

A chronological history of events leading up to the suit will make the issues more understandable. The events related will be those…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  3. Traders & General Insurance v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. TEXAS EMPLOYEES'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Associated Employers Lloyds v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API