Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Gifford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1992No. 3-91-094-CVPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

We are asked to review a judgment rendered in favor of appellee Earl Gifford in a disability-discrimination lawsuit against appellants City of Austin, Jim Everett, Raymond Sanders, and Freddie Maxwell. After trial to a jury, Gifford was awarded actual damages of approximately $74,000, prejudgment interest, and attorney’s fees in the amount of $18,900. In addition, the trial court’s judgment ordered the City to reinstate Gifford to a position financially commensurate with his former position and to pay “front pay” until the time of his reinstatement, for a maximum of two years.

Th…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Huckabay v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. NME Hospitals, Inc. v. RennelsTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Mayberry v. Texas Department of Agriculture, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Farrington v. Sysco Food Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API