Legal Opinion

DLH, Inc. v. Russ

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1996No. C2-95-1218PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant contends the district court erred in granting summary judgment to respondents in this action over corporate shares of stock in a bankruptcy estate. Although we view some claims with skepticism, we see no genuine issue of fact on this record or under applicable law. The district court properly ruled that appellant has no enforceable rights to the stock at issue and, therefore, has no claim for conversion. We affirm.

FACTS

This action involves a dispute over title to 1.54 million shares of Damark International stock. Respondents David Russ and Mark Cohn incorporated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Balder v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In the Matter of Lawrence Kaiser, as Trustee of the Estates of Telemark Management Company, Inc., Debtors. Appeal of Sheila Wise and Anthony WiseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Appletree Square I Ltd. Partnership v. Investmark, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Girard v. Michener (In Re Michener)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  3. DLH, Inc. v. RussCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API