Legal Opinion

Lasky v. Economy Grocery Stores

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1946PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHonan, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by Mary F. Lasky, hereinafter called the plaintiff, from the explosion of a bottle of a carbonated beverage described as “tonic” that she had taken from one of several wooden cases which had been set up in the defendant’s store for the purpose of sale to customers who were willing to serve themselves by selecting the bottles they wished to purchase and by paying for them as they left the store. The plaintiff had a verdict upon a count in the declaration alleging a breach of an implied warranty of fitness of a bottle…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gargaro v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  2. Ruffin v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Burnham v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Osborn v. . GantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Bunday v. Columbus Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Giant Food, Inc. v. Washington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Fender v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Loch Et Ux. v. Confair Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. State v. JesserIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Groomes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API