Legal Opinion

The Edward Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 14, 1905No. Nos. 1,350,1,351PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal and Cross-Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.

1Opinion of the Court

BURTON,

Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court, sitting in admiralty, pronounced by Ricks, District Judge, condemning both the steamer Edward Smith No. 2 and the steamer Masaba for a negligent collision between the steamers Edward *33Smith No. 2 and the barge Aurania, by which both the steamer and the barge sustained heavy damages. The collision occurred in or near to the dredged channel by which the canal proper is approached from the head of Take St. Clair. It occurred in broad daylight on July 24, 1898, and the vessels implicated were long in view of each other,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Belden v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. The Great RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. The SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. City of Cleveland v. ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dorrington v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Crosby Transp. Co. v. SautterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
  3. Atlas Transp. Co. v. Lee Line SteamersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktien Gesellschaft v. GyeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1913
  5. Ohio River Company v. Continental Grain CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API