Legal Opinion

Holyoak v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 5, 2018No. 20170374-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam Opinion

2Per curiam

¶1 Appellant Max G. Morgan appeals the denial of his motion to set aside a judgment under rule 60(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure based upon a claim of excusable neglect. We affirm.

¶2 On January 27, 2017, the district court issued a Temporary Civil Stalking Injunction, which was served on Morgan on or about January 30, 2017. On February 15, 2017, Morgan filed a request for an evidentiary hearing. See Utah Code Ann. § 77 -3a-101(6) (LexisNexis 2012) (allowing a respondent to request, in writing, an evidentiary hearing within ten days after service of an ex parte civil…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Layton/OklandUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Advanced Restoration, L.L.C. v. PriskosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  3. Bodell Construction Co. v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. Weber v. Mikarose, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  5. Aghdasi v. SaberinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rojas v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. State v. RushtonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API