Legal Opinion
Goishen v. Samor Realty Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided April 29, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
Harriet Goishen is an infant of some six years of age. Her father, Saul Goishen, upon his application, was appointed her guardian ad litem to prosecute an action for personal injuries sustained by her as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant. The action was instituted in the usual form: “ Harriet Goishen, an Infant, by Saul Goishen, her Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiff, against Samor Realty Co., Inc., Defendant.”
*478When the case came on for trial it was dismissed by the calendar justice because of the plaintiff’s failure to proceed. No direction was made as to costs. The defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. WoodheadNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Waring v. Crane & CanfieldNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
- Wice v. Commercial Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877
- Johnson v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Lentine v. JacobsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quillen v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1952
- Stevenson v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1941
- Roe v. DoeNew York City Family Court · 1968
- Holmberg v. AndersonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1942
- Tusch v. LindquistCity of New York Municipal Court · 1972