Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. De Land

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin

Decided November 6, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. On motion to strike plea from files.

1Opinion of the Court

Dtek, D. J.

On the thirteenth day of April, 1869, letters patent No. 88,830, for an improvement in the manufacture of cheese, were issued to J. W, Andrews and N. J. Ogden, of the state of New York. On the third day of November, 1874, reissue letters patent No. 6,117 were issued to the plaintiff Hubbell, as the assignee by mesne assign*472ments of Andrews and Ogden, and the bill in this ease is filed to restrain the infringement of said reissue letters patent, and for an account. To this bill the defendant has interposed a plea which avers that the original patent, issued to Andrews and Ogden, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evans v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  3. Birdsall v. PeregoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1865
  4. Nichols v. Dusenbury & BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  5. Bailey v. Le RoyNew York Court of Chancery · 1836

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Knox Rock-Blasting Co. v. Rairdon Stone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1898
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. Ascot Tobacco WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
  3. Thresher v. General Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1906
  4. American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Bayless Pulp & Paper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Schnauffer v. AsteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API