Legal Opinion
Kayrouz v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 22, 2004No. 03-5372PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Walid Kayrouz, a native and citizen of Lebanon, appeals the district court order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The government has expressly waived oral argument. Kayrouz has been deemed to have waived oral argument because he failed to respond to this court’s show cause letter concerning the waiver of such argument. This panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Kayrouz entered the United States in September 1988 as a lawful permanent resident. In July 2001, he pleaded guilty to using a telephone to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Et Al. v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIOSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Farid Masud Asad v. Janet Reno, Attorney General Doris Meissner Lynn Underdown Leslie Klinefelter Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Khan v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ravindrakumar M. Patel v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Evola v. CarboneDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Pinet v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Pinet v. US Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008
- Pinet v. US ImmigrationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008