Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 1983No. 82-821PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Having been convicted by a jury of assault with intent to commit mayhem, D.C. Code § 22-502 (1981), appellant asserts that the indictment was fatally defective and that the evidence was insufficient to convict. Lastly' he urges that newly discovered evidence proffered by him warranted a new trial. Finding these contentions to be unpersuasive, we affirm.

On a June evening in 1981, appellant watched from his car as complainant, John Ferrentino, entered the passenger side of a vehicle driven by Anna Davis, a woman with whom appellant had been romantically involved. Appellant followed closely in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Franey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Heard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Byers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Payne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API