Legal Opinion

Denbow v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 6, 1992No. 05-91-01330-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Justice.

The trial court convicted Timmy Ray Denbow of possession of methamphetamine and assessed punishment at five years’ confinement. In a single point of error, Denbow challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. We sustain the point of error. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and render a judgment of acquittal.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. We determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the offense…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Carlsen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Beardsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. McGoldrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. McCullough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stokes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1993
  2. Hubert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. Benjamin Fred Clark v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  4. Gary Westbrook v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Hubert v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API