Robins v. Blaney
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The principal issue on this appeal is the proper interpretation of section 2509 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Education *397Law, also known as the Jarema Act.* It provides that teachers shall be appointed by school boards for a probationary period of three years, and that when the probationary period is fully and satisfactorily served, the teacher is entitled to tenure (subd 2). The statute also permits a teacher who has rendered satisfactory service as a regular substitute for a period of two years to apply such substitute service in reduction of the three-year probationary term…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Mtr. Lezette v. Bd. of Educ., HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Ward v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Town of Amherst v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Mugavin v. NyquistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- Matter of Better World Real Estate Group v. New York City Dept. of Fin.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Speichler v. Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Brown v. New York State Racing & Wagering BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Panepinto v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pascal v. Board of Education of the City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.