Legal Opinion

State v. Beaver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1988No. 383A87PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s only assignment of error is to what he contends is the court’s coercion of the jury into reaching a verdict. He says this was done by the questions and comments of the court to the jury. The question of a court’s coercion of a jury to reach a verdict has been considered in several cases. See State v. Forrest, 321 N.C. 186, 362 S.E. 2d 252 (1987); State v. Bussey, 321 N.C. 92, 361 S.E. 2d 564 (1987); State v. Fowler, 312 N.C. 304, 322 S.E. 2d 389 (1984); and State v. Yarborough, 64 N.C. App. 500, 307 S.E. 2d 794 (1983). The rule from these cases is that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. BusseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. PorterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. BostonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API