Legal Opinion

Will v. Michigan Department of State Police

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 15, 1989No. 87-1207PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

491 U. S. 58 (1989)

WILL

v.

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE ET AL.

No. 87-1207.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 5, 1988

Decided June 15, 1989

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN

William Burnham argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Clark Cunningham, Paul D. Reingold, John A. Powell, Helen Hershkoff, and Steven R. Shapiro.

George H. Weller, Assistant Attorney General of Michigan, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, and Thomas L. Casey, Assistant Solicitor…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · White; Dissent · Brennan; Dissent · Stevens.

2Cases cited95 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ronnie Stilwell v. City of WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Alfred Copeland v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. (PC) Deegan v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  4. (PC) Farmer v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. (PC) Fields v. ParamoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API