Legal Opinion

Hatfield Ex Rel. Rose v. Cruise

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1938No. CC 581PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, President:

The question of the sufficiency of a declaration is here presented. The trial court, deeming the declaration insufficient, sustained the defendants’ demurrers thereto, and certified the matter to this court for review.

The action is based on a bond in the penalty of $3,-500.00 executed by L. K. Cruise, deputy sheriff of McDowell County, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, surety, payable to McGinnis Hatfield, sheriff of the county. The condition of the bond is to save the sheriff harmless from “any act or acts' of larceny or embezzlement” by Cruise in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. RandichWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Poling v. MaddoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hatfield Ex Rel. Justice v. WyattWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Vogler v. Board of Commissioners of Ohio CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boone National Bank of Madison v. MannsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Beckley v. RobertsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hatfield Ex Rel. Rose v. CruiseWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API