United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This appeal considers the right of steelworkers to intervene in a Title VII employment discrimination action against their employers and union. Because the workers *452did not move to intervene in a timely fashion, we affirm the district court’s denial of their motion.
The United States, on behalf of the Secretary of Labor and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, filed an action against nine of the major steel producers and the United Steelworkers of America under Section 707 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. The complaint alleged (1) that the companies and union…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cotton v. HintonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Reeves v. International Telephone And Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- 22 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1173, 22 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 30,841 Murphy Smith, Jr. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Fred B. Fluitt, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Charlie Corley and Levaughn Carter, Individually, Etc. v. Jackson Police Department, Etc., R.D. Thaggard, Applicants for Intervention-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Lyndon Larouche, Jr., Maxine Lowell, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.