Legal Opinion
Lyndon Larouche, Jr., Maxine Lowell, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 28, 1982No. 124, Docket 81-6106PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying a Rule 24 motion to intervene. For the reasons discussed below, we hold that appellant was entitled to intervene as a matter of right, and reverse with instructions to permit intervention.
In December 1975, Lyndon LaRouche and several other individuals associated with the National Conference of Labor Committees (NCLC) sued the FBI and two of its officers, claiming that the FBI had conducted an unlawful investigation of the NCLC. Pursuant to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, Oneida of the Thames Band, the Houdenosaunee, Applicants-Intervenors-Appellants v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Mokhiber v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wilder v. BernsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- United States v. Yonkers Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.