Legal Opinion

McNeill & Higgins Co. v. Martin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1926No. 25602PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

On July 15, 1920, defendant sold plaintiff “170 barrels (not more) St. Delphine second sugars.” On July 21st- defendant shipped 159 barrels of St. Delphine second sugars, which were duly received and paid for by plaintiff on July 27th.

On receipt of the sugar, plaintiff made only a “casual” inspection thereof, and placed same in its warehouse; the reason why only a casual, and not a thorough, inspection thereof was made, being that plaintiff’s “regular” sugar buyer was then taking his summer vacation, who remained away for the whole of the month of August, and discontinued altogether his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hipolite Egg Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Rocchi v. SchwabacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  3. Camors v. MaddenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  4. Ninety-Five Barrels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cervitor Kitchens, Inc. v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. United States v. 1851 CartonsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1944
  3. Quirk v. Raymond Heard, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Barkley & Co. v. Burguieres Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. John Barkley & Co. v. J. M. Burguieres Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API