Legal Opinion

United States v. 1851 Cartons

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 22, 1944No. 11605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYMES, District Judge.

The defendant-claimant at the end of the Government’s case moved to dismiss the libel on the ground that the Government’s evidence does not sustain the charge.

After considerable argument the court granted the motion, stating its reasons, upon the condition that the claimant give bond that in the selling or disposition of any of this fish they give to the retailers written notice calling attention to the fact there had been found in the shipment an occasional bad fish, and the retailer before selling or delivering it to any customer should warn the purchaser to examine it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. A. O. Andersen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  2. United States v. Two Hundred Cases of Adulterated Tomato CatsupDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1914
  3. United States v. Two Hundred Cases of Canned SalmonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1923
  4. Knapp v. CallawayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  5. United States v. SpragueDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. 1,200 CANS, PASTEURIZED WHOLE EGGS, ETC.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
  2. United States v. An Article of Food Consisting of: 1,200 Cans, Article Labeled in Part (can) 30 Lbs. Net Weight, Pasteurized Whole Eggs, Distributed by Frigid Food Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
  3. United States v. 1851 CartonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API