Legal Opinion

Weimann v. County of Kane

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1986No. 2-85-0940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Unverzagt

Plaintiff, Steve Weimann, brought suit in the circuit court of Kane County naming Kane County, the Kane County State’s Attorney’s office, the village of Sugar Grove, the Sugar Grove police department, the city of St. Charles, and the St. Charles police department as defendants. He voluntarily dismissed his claim against all of the defendants except Kane County (the county), against which he filed a three-count amended complaint. Count I of the amended complaint alleges a violation of plaintiff’s civil rights pursuant to section 1983 of the United States Code (42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 (1982)).…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nathson Fields v. Lawrence WharrieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Cooney v. Chicago Public SchoolsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Knapper v. ConnickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. Davis v. TempleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Burghardt v. RemiyacAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API