Legal Opinion
Arauz v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 18, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01663Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YILENIA ARAUZ, No. 2:22-cv-01663-DC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14 M.A.C. COSMETICS, INC., AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED 15 Defendant. COMPLAINT 16 (Doc. Nos. 16, 20) 17 18 This matter is before the court on Defendant M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.’s (“MAC”) motion 19 for summary judgment and Plaintiff Yilenia Arauz’s motion for leave to file a first amended 20 complaint. (Doc. Nos. 16, 20). Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.