Legal Opinion
Windmöller v. Laguerre
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 8, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 544-68PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GESELL, District Judge.
The origins of this litigation have been set out in a prior Memorandum Opinion dated May 3, 1968, 284 F.Supp. 563. After a full hearing, briefs, and oral argument, the Court now has before it the amended complaint challenging validity of the two Laguerre patents being exploited by defendants. The validity of each of these patents is challenged on grounds of obviousness and as to Laguerre II on the added ground of double patenting. An extended discussion is unnecessary for the facts are mainly not in dispute, the alleged inventions simple, and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- C-Thru Products, Inc. And Leon Laguerre v. Uniflex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Noma Lites Canada Ltd. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Robintech, Inc. v. Chemidus Wavin, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978