Legal Opinion

C & W Asset Acquisition LLC v. Knox

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 1, 2004No. 03-11147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff C & W Asset Acquisition, LLC (“C & W”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment, sua sponte, in favor of defendant Donald Knox (“Knox”), finding no genuine issue of material fact that C & W’s action to collect on a matured promissory note was time-barred. Specifically, the district court held that C & W, as an assignee of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), cannot benefit from the tolling provision in 28 U.S.C. § 2415 for partial payments made after an assignment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Stine v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Herman v. HolidayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Hinsley v. Boudloche (In Re Hinsley)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Love v. National Medical EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Board of Supervisors of LSUCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025
  2. Iyer v. Syndigo LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API