Legal Opinion
Womble v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 17, 1969No. 124, September Term, 1969PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.
The provisions of the general law relating to juvenile causes, Md. Code, Art. 26, §§ 51-70, as they previously existed and as amended by Chapter 432, Acts 1969, do not apply to Montgomery County, § 71. Juvenile causes in Montgomery County are covered by Art. 26, §§ 72-90 and jurisdiction of them is vested in two judges of the People’s Court of Montgomery County, § 72. Pursuant to procedures prescribed by § 86c, James David Womble, an adult, appeared before a judge of the People’s Court of Montgomery County having jurisdiction of juvenile causes. He “was charged in that Court with unlawfully…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Berger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Wentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Nolan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. BernierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- State v. TobinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- United States v. CuellarUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- State v. TarmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.