Legal Opinion

Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. Young

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1923No. 8 Div. 480PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

Demurrer was overruled to the bill, which sought to enforce the landlord’s lien on the tenant’s interest in a sewing machine.

I-t is averred that the sewing machine was brought upon the rented premises “by the defendants,” and that it was kept by the tenant in the dwelling he rented from complainant. Leader v. Romano, 208 Ala. 635, 95 South. 7; Mathers v. Barrow, 202 Ala. 342, 80 South. 424. The bill further avers that the purchase price of the machine was not fully paid by the tenant, and it was removed from the rented premises by the Singer Sewing Machine Company a few days before the'…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Westmoreland & Trousdale v. FosterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Manchuria S. S. Co. v. Harry G. G. Donald & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Bingham v. VandegriftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Tanner & Delaney Engine Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Leader v. RomanoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Isbell-Hallmark Furniture Co. v. SitzAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API