Legal Opinion

Feehely v. Rogers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1938Published

1Opinion

Petition for rehearing denied June 28, 1938

On Petition eor Rehearing

(80 P. (2d) 717)

ROSSMAN, J.

A petition for a rehearing filed by the defendant presents the three following contentions. We quote from the petition:

“An action of ejectment cannot be maintained upon a title which is merely equitable. * * *
“The court erred in holding that the county court of Hood River county, Oregon, had authority to waive the forfeiture provisions contained in section I, subd. e. of chapter 220, Laws of Oregon for 1931. * * *
“In no event is this plaintiff entitled to maintain this action at law in ejectment to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sommer v. ComptonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Kingsley v. United Rys. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co. v. HertzbergOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Browning v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Feehely v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API