Legal Opinion

Martin v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 24, 2005No. 2004-3023PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Michael Martin (“Martin”) challenges an arbitrator’s award sustaining his demotion by the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”). The VA demoted Martin because he no longer satisfied the conditions of employment as a police officer, having failed to pass the psychological assessment required to carry arms. Even accepting Martin’s argument that the arbitrator may have applied an incorrect standard in reviewing the agency’s decision and impermissibly shifted the burden of proof, we conclude that the arbitrator’s error was harmless because there is no material…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. NuttSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Constance Berry Newman, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Eugene J. Corrado, and Washington Area Metal Trades CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Robert H. Girani v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Shirley Zingg v. Department of the Treasury, Irs.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. David Wissman v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John S. Pope v. United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Lee v. FaaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  3. Lockwood v. DVACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  4. Mayberry v. Department of Defense Dependents Schools EuropeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  5. Pope, John S. v. TRANCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API