Legal Opinion
Fred C. Yandle, Hugh S. Yandle and William N. Yandle, Individually and as Co-Partners, Etc. v. Hardware Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 11, 1963No. 17977_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
In 1953 the Mast Lumber Company was engaged in the trucking business. It carried a comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance policy issued by St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company. The policy provided that the insurer would pay on behalf of the insured all claims which the insured became obligated to pay by reason of liability imposed upon it by law for bodily injury or death. “Insured” is defined in the policy to mean the named insured or any other person, firm or corporation, while using or legally responsible for the use of the insured’s vehicles, provided…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'n v. Cal-Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Osborne v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Columbia Southern Chemical Corp. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Firkins v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. AETNA INS. CO. OF HARTFORDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- United States Steel Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. United States Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Travelers Insurance v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.